Chi, N., Demiris, G., Lewis, F.M., Walker, A.J., & Langer, S.L. (2016). Behavioral and educational interventions to support family caregivers in end-of-life care. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 33, 894–908.
STUDY PURPOSE: To collect, review, and report on the current evidence on behavioral and educational interventions used to support family caregivers of patients who are receiving end-of-life care
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: End-of-life care
APPLICATIONS: Palliative care
Educational and behavioral interventions for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer at the end of life appear to be effective. They are difficult to study because of high attrition rates, in part because of the point in the illness trajectory in which one is asked to participate. However, increasing evidence supports that these types of interventions will benefit caregiver competence and well-being. Ongoing study is needed to identify more specifics about the interventions, what makes them successful, and the methods of delivery, the timing, and the dose, as well as what outcomes should be measured and with what instruments. Perhaps some consistency should be developed. The cost-effectiveness of interventions should be considered as well.
Educational and behavioral interventions for caregivers appear to be helpful in improving caregiver outcomes, with statistical improvement seen in a variety of caregiver domains. The type of intervention strategy used seems to influence the specificity and breadth of outcomes influenced, with some showing more results on competence and knowledge and others expanding beyond competence and knowledge to include an additional impact on the emotional well-being and quality of life of the caregiver. All three types of interventions appear to have positive impact. Care must be taken when choosing an intervention, considering what outcome is desire.
Chiu, L., Chow, R., Popovic, M., Navari, R.M., Shumway, N.M., Chiu, N., . . . DeAngelis, C. (2016). Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 2381–2392.
STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of olanzapine compared to other antiemetic regimens for preventative and breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). A secondary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 mg compared to 10 mg olanzapine for the prevention of CINV.
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
APPLICATIONS: Elder care
Efficacy of Acute Phase: Olanzapine was statistically superior to non-olanzapine regimens for emesis (RR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.03, 1.17]) but not nausea. The 10 mg olanzapine was statistically superior to a non-olanzapine regimen for emesis and nausea.
Efficacy of Delayed Phase: Olanzapine was statistically superior to standard antiemetic regimens for emesis (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.14, 1.52]) and for nausea (RR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.15, 1.97]). The 10 mg olanzapine was statistically superior to a non-olanzapine regimen for emesis (RR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.11, 1.54]) and nausea (RR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.15, 1.97]).
Efficacy Overall: Olanzapine was statistically superior to standard anti-emetic regimens for emesis (RR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.18, 1.68]) and for nausea (RR 1.53, 95% CI [1.18, 1.97]). Olanzapine 5 mg and 10 mg were both statistically superior for emesis, and 10 mg strength was superior for nausea. No studies were available for nausea with 5 mg.
Efficacy of Breakthrough: Only emesis (not nausea) was available for analysis, and olanzapine showed superiority (RR = 2.09, 95% CI [1.63, 2.68]) to non-olanzapine regimens.
Olanzapine is effective in treating emesis at all time points and is effective in treating nausea in the delayed phase. More studies are needed to determine the most effective dosing.
Olanzapine should be used as an adjunct medication for the treatment of acute chemotherapy related vomiting, breakthrough vomiting, and delayed CINV.
Chiu, H.Y., Shyu, Y.K., Chang, P.C., & Tsai, P.S. (2016). Effects of acupuncture on menopause-related symptoms in breast cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Nursing, 39, 228–237.
STUDY PURPOSE: To use meta-analysis technique to examine the short-term and intermediate-term effects of acupuncture on menopause-related symptoms, particularly on hot flashes, in breast cancer survivors
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
Acupuncture produced small-size effects on reducing hot-flash frequency and the severity of menopause-related symptoms. This effect did not persist even one to three months on hot-flash frequency and severity.
Acupuncture and sham control procedures might offer a short-term reduction in the severity and frequency of hot flashes, but more research with larger longer studies is needed.
Chiusolo, P., Salutari, P., Sica, S., Scirpa, P., Laurenti, L., Piccirillo, N., & Leone, G. (1998). Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue: Leuprorelin acetate for the prevention of menstrual bleeding in premenopausal women undergoing stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 21, 821–823.
Low-dose leuprorelin acetate (Lupron®) 3.75 mg given subcutaneously at least 30 days prior to transplant conditioning regimen and the second injection given 28 days after the first
Mean duration of thrombocytopenia was 28 days; only one patient developed menstrual bleeding during this time. No side effects related to leuprorelin acetate were noted.
Chiu, H.Y., Chiang, P.C., Miao, N.F., Lin, E.Y., & Tsai, P.S. (2014). The effects of mind-body interventions on sleep in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 75, 1215–1223.
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
The primary outcome was a change in a sleep parameters. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that MBIs had a medium effect size on the improvement of sleep quality, and this effect persisted up to three months after treatment. The weighted mean effect size was -0.43 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.62), and the long-term effect size (up to three months) was -0.29 (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.06). The sensitivity analysis revealed that MBIs had a significant effect on sleep (g = -0.33, p < 0.001). The moderating effects of components of the intervention, methodologic features, subject characteristics, and the quality of the studies on the relationship between MBIs and sleep were not found (all p values > 0.05). The main interventions used in included studies in which yoga and mindfulness-based stress reduction were employed. Some studies involved the use of meditation, hypnosis, or sleep hygiene interventions. Yoga interventions yielded an effect size similar to that of other individual interventions (g = -0.40, p = 0.71).
This meta-analysis suggested that MBIs yield a medium effect size on sleep quality, and its effects are maintained for up to three months.
Although there was a comprehensive review of the literature, the selection criteria may have limited the studies included in the review, and the search strategies may have influenced the articles obtained. Only RCTs with MBIs reporting improved sleep outcomes may have been published, and studies with negative results may have been missed, causing a publication bias. Analysis was only done across all studies, which had substantially different interventions, some of which included cognitive behavioral therapy, which is shown to be effective in sleep improvement. The validity of calculating results across studies with very different interventions is questionable. Different methods of measurement were used in some studies as well. The included studies all lacked attention control.
The findings of this meta-analysis support the implementation of MBIs into multimodal approaches to managing sleep quality in patients with cancer; however, it should be recognized that this pooled analysis was done across specific interventions that were very different from each other, and there are multiple limitations that affect the strength of these conclusions.
Chiu, H.Y., Huang, H.C., Chen, P.Y., Hou, W.H., & Tsai, P.S. (2015). Walking improves sleep in individuals with cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42, E54–E62.
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
Overall, the effect size for walking on sleep disturbance was -0.52 (Hedges' g: 95%; CI -0.79, -0.25). There was significant overall heterogeneity among the studies. Multiple subgroup analyses were conducted to explore factors that may contribute to the heterogeneity. The effect size was not associated with age, gender, the duration of the intervention, or adherence rate. An analysis demonstrated no evidence of publication bias. Studies were done before, during, or after treatment for cancer, and the overall effect sizes did not differ according to the timing of the intervention. All studies used walking of moderate intensity, and most studies were done in women with breast cancer. Some studies included additional exercise interventions such as strength training, and some also included psychoeducational interventions.
Walking exercise appears to improve sleep in patients with cancer.
There was a relatively small number of studies included with high heterogeneity. Twelve studies were excluded because they did not report sufficient data to compute an effect size or they did not use a self-reported sleep outcome. These excluded studies, which have been summarized in other PEP® summaries, did not demonstrate the effectiveness of exercise. This suggests that effectiveness may be overestimated in this analysis.
This analysis provides some support for moderate intensity walking exercise to improve sleep. The findings need to be viewed with caution because of the high heterogeneity of the studies and the contrary findings that were excluded from this analysis. However, walking is a safe activity for patients, and it can be suggested to patients as an approach that may improve sleep. It also could be incorporated into multicomponent approaches to address sleep-wake disturbances.
Chiu, H.Y., Hsieh, Y.J., & Tsai, P.S. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture to reduce cancer-related pain. European Journal of Cancer Care. Advance online publication.
STUDY PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of acupuncture in reducing cancer-related pain associated with treatment types
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
APPLICATIONS: Palliative care
Eleven trials focused on radiation-induced pain, and five focused on surgery-induced pain. The majority of trials (17) focused on general cancer-related pain. Overall analysis showed that acupuncture reduced cancer-related pain with a small effect size (-0.45, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.26]). There was high and significant heterogeneity. In the 17 trials regarding cancer-related pain, the weighted mean effect size was -0.71 (95% CI [-0.94, -0.48]), without significant heterogeneity. Among trials examining radiation-related pain, no effect was found. For surgical-related pain, mean effect size for five randomized, controlled trials was -0.4 (95% CI [-0.69, -0.1]) with high heterogeneity. For patients receiving hormonal therapy, no significant effect was seen.
Acupuncture may be helpful in reducing chronic cancer pain and pain associated with surgical procedures.
Evidence regarding efficacy of acupuncture for pain is limited; however, findings from this meta-analysis suggest that it may be helpful for chronic and acute pain in patients with cancer. Effect sizes were small.
Chitapanarux, I., Chitapanarux, T., Traisathit, P., Kudumpee, S., Tharavichitkul, E., & Lorvidhaya, V. (2010). Randomized controlled trial of live lactobacillus acidophilus plus bifidobacterium bifidum in prophylaxis of diarrhea during radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients. Radiation Oncology, 5, 31.
To determine if the combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum is effective in preventing diarrhea in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer receiving radiation therapy
Patients were randomized to receive either L. acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum or placebo capsules. Beginning 7 days before and continuing throughout the entire time of receiving radiotherapy, participants took 2 capsules, 2 times each day before breakfast and dinner. Patients needing antidiarrheal medication were given loperamide (2 mg).
The study was conducted in Thailand.
All patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2, was used.
The prophylactic use of the combination of live L. acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum was shown to be effective in decreasing the severity of diarrhea.
The prophylactic use of L. acidophilus plus Bifidobacterium bifidum may decrease the severity of diarrhea, improve stool consistency, and reduce the need for antidiarrheal medication in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing pelvic radiation with concomitant weekly cisplatin. Further studies need to be done with larger samples.
Chipperfield, K., Brooker, J., Fletcher, J., & Burney, S. (2013). The impact of physical activity on psychosocial outcomes in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: A systematic review. Health Psychology.
To evaluate the effectiveness of physical activity on depression and anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review
DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Informit, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL
KEYWORDS: Prostate neoplasm, prostate cancer, prostate carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, androgen deprivation therapy, androgen ablation, androgen suppression, hormone therapy, androgen antagonist, androgen agonist, gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, antiandrogen, orchidectomy, surgical castration, chemical castration, physical activity, physical exercise, exercise, sport therapy, sport, endurance, aerobic training, resistance training, cardiac training, aerobic activity, resistance activity, and motor activity
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Physical activity interventions, exercise interventions, and supervised and nonsupervised interventions. Participants who were patients with prostate cancer receiving ADT only (or separate results according to cancer and treatment type). All study designs. Pilot studies (no sample size limitations). Published in English.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies with the additional interventions of psychotherapy or nutritional consultation. Studies about physical activity behavior or motivation. Studies involving outcomes other than depression, anxiety, quality of life, or cognitive function. Studies involving the impact of physical activity on patients with prostate cancer undergoing forms of treatment other than ADT.
TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: N = 867
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Reviewed studies for inclusion and exclusion criteria. No appraisal or scoring system used.
PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
Existing data suggest that physical activity improved quality of life. The existing evidence, however, is not sufficiently robust to determine the adequacy of physical activity as an intervention to improve depression, anxiety, and cognitive function outcomes. One study examined impact on depression and found no significant effect.
Preliminary findings support physical activity to improve quality of life in men receiving ADT for prostate cancer.
Evidence suggests that clinical exercise in the form of resistance and combined aerobic and resistance training programs may be important for the health status and rehabilitation of patients with prostate cancer.
Chih, M.Y., DuBenske, L.L., Hawkins, R.P., Brown, R.L., Dinauer, S.K., Cleary, J.F., & Gustafson, D.H. (2013). Communicating advanced cancer patients' symptoms via the Internet: A pooled analysis of two randomized trials examining caregiver preparedness, physical burden, and negative mood. Palliative Medicine, 27, 533–543.
To examine the effects of an online symptom reporting system on caregiver negative mood, preparedness, and perceptions of physical burden
Following recruitment, patients were randomized to either the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS) only intervention or CHESS plus clinician report (CR). The CHESS only group of patient-caregiver dyads accessed the CHESS website for coaching, information, and communication resources for advanced-stage cancer care. At baseline and weekly, dyads “checked in” to CHESS to report needs and symptoms informed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. “Checking in” allowed symptom tracking to evaluate patient improvement or decline. Caregivers also reported preparedness and caregiving burden and could pose questions for future clinical visits. The CHESS plus CR group would access the CHESS website as well as have access to the ePRO system (CR) that delivered dyadic tracking information and alerts to clinicians when the patient or caregiver met certain criteria of concern. The ePRO system would support clinicians’ timely response to improve caregiver management of patient symptoms and lessen burden. Intervention technical support was provided to both groups. CHESS intervention access varied from 12–24 months based on patient diagnosis, and caregivers sequentially were assessed following the intervention.
Caregivers in the CHESS plus CR group reported more positive moods than those in the CHESS alone group at 6 months (p = 0.009) and 12 months (p = 0.004). However, the two groups did not differ significantly on caregiver preparedness or physical burden at 6- and 12-month assessment.
Online delivery of information, communication, and coaching resources, combined with a format that supports patient and caregiver reporting of symptoms to facilitate clinician-caregiver timely communication, has the potential to improve caregiver mood and minimize distress of patients with advanced-stage cancer.
Advances in technology offer opportunities for oncology clinicians to partner with patients and their caregivers to promote patient and caregiver health during the cancer trajectory. Issues such as clinician heavy workload and continued clinical focus on patient needs challenge oncology clinicians in redefining workplace approaches to improve outcomes for patients and their caregivers.