Skip to main content

Otani, H., Morita, T., Uno, S., Yamamoto, R., Hirose, H., Matsubara, T., . . . Sasaki, K. (2014). Effect of leaflet-based intervention on family members of terminally ill patients with cancer having delirium: Historical control study. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 31, 322–326. 

Study Purpose

To assess the effects of an informational leaflet about delirium on family-perceived distress, the need for improvement in professional care for delirium, and the knowledge about the causes of delirium in patients during the end of life

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Palliative care practitioners distributed an informational leaflet on delirium as part of their routine care of patients. Families of patients who experienced delirium at the end of life were then contacted by mail six months after the patient had died to complete a questionnaire about their experience.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 113   
  • MEAN AGE = 74 years
  • MALES: 61%, FEMALES: 39%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Not applicable
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Predominately spouse of patient (42%) or child of patient (36%)

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Multiple settings    
  • LOCATION: Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: End-of-life care
  • APPLICATIONS: Palliative care 

Study Design

Single-arm, historical control

Measurement Instruments/Methods

A questionnaire was developed for the study that measured family distress (single item), the need for improvements in professional care for delirium (single item), and knowledge of the causes of delirium (single item). A Likert-type scale was used for each question.

Results

The intervention group had a better understanding of certain aspects of the causes of delirium (p < 0.001). No difference was reported between the historical control and intervention groups in terms of the levels of family-perceived distress or the need for improvement in professional care for delirium.

Conclusions

An educational leaflet may improve family members' knowledge and understanding about some of the causes of delirium at the end of life.

Limitations

  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Risk of bias (no appropriate attentional control condition)
  • Unintended interventions or applicable interventions not described that would influence results
  • Measurement validity/reliability questionable
  • Low return rate
  • Potential for recall bias among both groups surveyed

Nursing Implications

Written information about expected symptoms, such as delirium, may be helpful in increasing family members' knowledge.

Print

Otake, A., Yoshino, K., Ueda, Y., Sawada, K., Mabuchi, S., Kimura, T., . . . Kimura, T. (2015). Usefulness of duloxetine for Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy treatment in gynecological cancer patients. Anticancer Research, 35, 359–363.

Study Purpose

To explore the potential efficacy of duloxetine for use against chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) among patients with gynecologic cancers receiving paclitaxel

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

The medical records of patients being treated with duloxetine were evaluated retrospectively. The severity of symptoms before and after duloxetine administration was evaluated according to documented patient responses as either responders (symptoms dropped more than 1 grade) or non-responders (patients had a stable or worsening grade of neuropathy). A maintenance dose of duloxetine at 20 mg per day was given in 18 cases, and 40 mg per day was given in seven cases. In 12 cases, duloxetine administration began during chemotherapy. In 13 cases, it was started after chemotherapy (in four of these cases, one year after the completion of chemotherapy).

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 25  
  • MEDIAN AGE = 62 years (range = 40–77 years)
  • FEMALES: 100%
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Ovarian, corpus, and cervical cancers; all were receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without epirubicin; median accumulated dose of paclitaxel was 1,805 mg per body; accumulated median dose of carboplatin was 3,368 mg
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Prior to duloxetine, medications used in some patients included goshajinkigan, pregaabalin, vitamin B12, and SSRIs.

Setting

  • SITE: Single-site    
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
  • APPLICATIONS: Palliative care 

Study Design

Retrospective, observational trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v 4.0

Results

56% of patients responded to duloxetine and 44% did not respond. An analysis of demographic, disease, and treatment-related variables showed no significant association between any of these factors and the effectiveness of duloxetine. Adverse events were mild, and duloxetine generally was well tolerated. Overall, older patients tended to be less responsive to duloxetine.

Conclusions

The majority of patients responded to duloxetine, suggesting that in some patients, it can be helpful in managing the symptoms of CIPN.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 30)
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Measurement validity/reliability questionable

 

 

Nursing Implications

The findings of this study suggest that duloxetine may be helpful for some patients for the prevention and management of CIPN. However, it was not effective in all cases. The study's findings were limited by its design. Additional research studies exploring effective dosages, the types of CIPN that respond to duloxetine, appropriate timing, and effects of duloxetine on the full range of CIPN symptoms rather than just pain are needed.

Print

Ota, M., Tatsumi, K., Suwa, H., Watanabe, J., Watanabe, K., Osada, S., . . . Endo, I. (2014). The effect of pyridoxine for prevention of hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy using capecitabine: A randomized study. Hepato-Gastroenterology, 61, 1008–1013. 

Study Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of pyridoxine for the prevention of hand-foot syndrome in patients receiving capecitabine

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Patients were randomized to receive pyridoxine or not. Pyridoxine 30 mg was given three times daily during chemotherapy. The primary study endpoint was hand-foot syndrome of grade 2 or higher.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 60   
  • MEAN AGE = 62.1 years
  • MALES: Not provided, FEMALES: Not provided
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Chemotherapy
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Colorectal cancer

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Outpatient    
  • LOCATION: Japan

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Study Design

Open-label, randomized, controlled trial

Measurement Instruments/Methods

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

Results

Sixty percent of patients had at least grade 2 hand-foot syndrome. No differences existed between study groups.

Conclusions

Pyridoxine was not shown to have an effect for the prevention of hand-foot syndrome.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no blinding)

 

Nursing Implications

Pyridoxine was not shown to have a preventive effect on the development of hand-foot syndrome. There are few interventions studied or shown to be effective for the prevention of this complication of cancer treatment. Ongoing research is needed to determine the effective approaches for the management of skin and nail toxicities.

Print

Ost, D.E., Ernst, A., Grosu, H.B., Lei, X., Diaz-Mendoza, J., Slade, M., . . . AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. (2015). Therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant central airway obstruction: Success rates and impact on dyspnea and quality of life. Chest, 147, 1282–1298. 

Study Purpose

To measure the technical success of therapeutic bronchoscopy and its impact in improving dyspnea and quality of life among patients with malignant central airway obstruction

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Data from the AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry) for 1,115 procedures on 947 patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopy from January 2009–February 2013 were used for this study. Primary outcome data were defined as greater than a 50% opening of airway lumen. A smaller subset (N = 187) of centers collected pre- and postprocedure (30 days) secondary outcome data looking at dyspnea improvement after bronchoscopy as measured via Borg scores and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measured via the SF-6D.

Sample Characteristics

  • N = 947   
  • AGE = 62.8 years
  • MALES: 55.6%, FEMALES: 44.4%
  • CURRENT TREATMENT: Other
  • KEY DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Of all participants, 71.7% had primary lung cancer.
  • OTHER KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: The sample size for clinical outcome data was 187.

Setting

  • SITE: Multi-site   
  • SETTING TYPE: Multiple settings    
  • LOCATION: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; the Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences Center, Chicago, IL; the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA; the Department of Interventional Pulmonology, Chicago Chest Center, Chicago, IL; the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; the Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; and the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care
  • APPLICATIONS: Elder care, palliative care

Study Design

  • Retrospective data analysis for technical outcomes
  • Prospective trial to evaluate clinical outcomes

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • SF-6D
  • Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale score 
  • Technical success was based on anatomic criteria defined as a brochoscopically reopening of the airway lumen to greater than 50% of the normal diameter, and the airway had to connect to a viable area of distal lung. All clinical outcomes were assessed by the attending physician using standardized definitions from a code book developed by the American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation and Education (AQuIRE) program, to evaluate therapeutic bronchoscopy for malignant central airway obstruction.

Results

The technical success rate of the therapeutic bronchoscopies was 90%–98%. Participants with an American Society of Anesthesiology score greater than 3 with renal failure, primary lung cancer, left mainstem disease, and tracheoesophageal fistula were linked with failure. In addition, participants who were heavy smokers and who had multiple cancers and lobar obstruction showed a smaller improvement than the other participants. A 3.9% complication rate was observed, 0.5% of the patients died postprocedure, and the 30-day mortality rate was 15%. Secondary outcome data post-procedure showed that 48% of the patients had a clinically significant improvement in dyspnea, dyspnea stayed the same in 43% of patients, and 9% had worse dyspnea. HRQOL improved postprocedure for 42% of patients. Those that had worse baseline dyspnea scores tended to have the greatest improvement. Those with lobular obstructions had smaller measures of improvement in HRQOL.

Conclusions

The use of therapeutic bronchoscopy for the treatment of malignant central airway obstruction had a high technical success rate. More importantly, patients showed significant improvement in their subjective rating of dyspnea and in HRQOL. Having clinical outcome data assists in the process of weighing potential risks versus benefits of this procedure. Given that some of the patients with the worst dyspnea at baseline ultimately had the greatest benefit, these patients should be considered for therapeutic bronchoscopy and not assumed to be too sick to benefit.

Limitations

  • Small sample (< 100)
  • Risk of bias (no control group)
  • Risk of bias (no random assignment)
  • Key sample group differences that could influence results
  • Findings not generalizable
  • No standard method of patient selection or standardization of procedure, as all clinical decisions were at the discretion of the individual performing the therapeutic bronchoscopy
  • Significant variations in practice patterns existed in different centers and locations of care.
  • Technical success rates were determined by the individual performing the procedure, and bias may have existed.

Nursing Implications

To educate and advocate for patients undergoing therapeutic bronchoscopies, nurses must be knowledgeable about the different types, purpose, indications, and potential risks and benefits of each. The technical success of the procedure is not sufficient enough in measuring the overall benefit to the patient; quality of life and palliation of dyspnea outcomes must also be considered.

Print

Ostuzzi, G., Benda, L., Costa, E., & Barbui, C. (2015). Efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants on the continuum of depressive experiences in patients with cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 41, 714–724.

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and acceptance of antidepressants on depression in patients with cancer
 
TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and hand searches on international websites for regulatory agencies
 
KEYWORDS: Not provided
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Trials comparing antidepressants with inactive control groups, randomized trials, published and unpublished work, any patients receiving antidepressants, and participants with major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, sythymic disorder, or depressive symptoms

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 4,587
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Cochrane risk of bias tool

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 21, and 19 in meta-analysis
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 2,007
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 19-549
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Varied tumor types, ages ranged from 18-89 years

Results

Antidepressants were effective in reducing distressing symptoms (SMD = -0.229, p = 0.018) and major depression or depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.285, p = 0.001).  All types of antidepressants showed some efficacy, although tricyclic antidepressants did not show efficacy across two small studies. SSRIs and manserin were effective. Quality of life measures were also improved. There was significant heterogeneity. Analysis showed significant efficacy was correlated with length of follow up (p < 0.001). Antidepressants did not differ from placebo in terms of acceptability, using drop-out rate as a proxy of acceptability.

Conclusions

Antidepressants of all types demonstrated overall efficacy for improvement in depressive symptoms as well as other distressing symptoms. SSRIs and manserin showed the best results

Limitations

Overall quality of reports was graded as low to moderate. Several studies included funding by drug companies, suggesting sponsorship bias as the funder role was not described.  There was significant heterogeneity

Nursing Implications

Findings from this analysis show that antidepressants, particularly SSRIs and manserin, were tolerable and effective in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with cancer. Findings also suggest that efficacy may increase over time, pointing to the potential need for sufficient duration of treatment. It is important that nurses screen for symptoms of depression among patients with cancer, and facilitate relevant treatment.

Print

Ostuzzi, G., Matcham, F., Dauchy, S., Barbui, C., & Hotopf, M. (2015). Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD011006. 

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: Assess effects of antidepressants among people with cancer for treatment of depression

TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO and hand searching of drug approval agencies
 
KEYWORDS: Extensive lists of search terms per database are provided
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing any antidepressant with placebo or another antidepressant. Adult patients 
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Trials in which antidepressants were compared to another agent such as stimulants, antipsychotics, etc.

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 4,498
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Cochrane risk of bias assessment

Sample Characteristics

  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 861
  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 9, with 7 used in meta-analysis
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 35-93
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Majority were in patients with breast cancer

 

Results

There was no differences between antidepressants as a class and placebo in five RCTs, no difference between groups comparing different antidepressants, and no difference in drop-out rates between placebo and antidepressants

Conclusions

The findings did not provide strong evidence for efficacy of antidepressants.

Limitations

Study quality was generally low with unclear risk of bias in multiple aspects of the study design and implementation. In five studies, risk of bias due to conflict of interest was questionable. There was no difference found between SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants. Studies included were all conducted prior to 2009.

Nursing Implications

This particular analysis did not demonstrate efficacy of antidepressants in patients with cancer for management of depressive symptoms. There were multiple limitations in this analysis due to the low quality of the studies included.

Print

Osterlund, P., Ruotsalainen, T., Korpela, R., Saxelin, M., Ollus, A., Valta, P., … Joensuu, H. (2007). Lactobacillus supplementation for diarrhoea related to chemotherapy of colorectal cancer: A randomised study. British Journal of Cancer, 97(8), 1028–1034.

Study Purpose

To assess the effect of Lactobacillus and fiber supplementation on tolerability of treatment with chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and to compare the tolerability and frequency of diarrhea with the Mayo regimen (bolus 5-FU) to that of the simplified de Gramont regiment (bolus plus continuous 5-FU)

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy monthly (Mayo regimen) or twice monthly (simplified de Gramont regimen) for 24 weeks. Further randomization determined whether patients received the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG gelatin capsules twice daily and daily fiber on cycle days 7–14 for 8 days per month during the 24 weeks of chemotherapy. All patients received dietary counseling and kept nutrition diaries. Treatment-related adverse effects were assessed at every cycle.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study reported on 148 patients.
  • Median age was 60 years, with a range of 31–75.
  • The sample was 49% female and 51% male.
  • Patients were scheduled to receive adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for Dukes’ B or C CRC or chemotherapy following surgery for Dukes’ D CRC who were rendered free from metastases by the surgery.

Setting

The study was conducted at a single-site, outpatient setting in Finland.

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

All patients were undergoing the active treatment phase of care.

Study Design

This was a prospective, randomized trial.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

The National Cancer Institute of Canada Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2, was used.

Results

  • Less grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in patients receiving Lactobacillus supplementation than in those not receiving it (22% versus 37%; p = 0.027). 
  • Less abdominal discomfort (flatulence, borborygmi, or abdominal distention) of any grade occurred in patients receiving Lactobacillus than in those not receiving it (59% versus 75%; p = 0.058). 
  • Only 21% of the patients receiving Lactobacillus had chemotherapy dose reductions due to bowel toxicity as compared to 47% of those who did not receive this supplement (p = 0.0008). 
  • Lactobacillus supplementation had no significant effects on overall treatment toxicity or on the frequency of stomatitis or neutropenia.
  • Fiber supplementation did not affect overall gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (p = 0.13).

Conclusions

The frequency of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and the frequency of abdominal discomfort may be decreased with the use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus supplementation for patients receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

Limitations

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC now commonly includes irinotecan, capecitabine, or oxaliplatin.  5-FU was the only adjuvant chemotherapy given in this study.
  • The study was neither placebo-controlled nor blinded to the administration of the fiber or Lactobacillus.
  • Metoclopramide and 5-HT3 inhibitors were used to treat nausea and vomiting. These medications could possibly have effected reported bowel toxicity.
  • No mention was made regarding whether patients were instructed to avoid yogurts and other dairy products produced by fermentation.
  • Use of antimicrobials was not mentioned as an exclusion criterion.

Nursing Implications

The administration of Lactobacilus rhamnosus GG may decrease the frequency and severity of diarrhea and abdominal discomfort with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Further placebo-controlled, blinded studies are needed.

Print

Oshima, K., Takahashi, T., Mori, T., Matsuyama, T., Usuki, K., Asano-Mori, Y., . . . Kanda, Y. (2010). One-year low-dose valacyclovir as prophylaxis for varicella zoster virus disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A prospective study of the Japan Hematology and Oncology Clinical Study Group. Transplant Infectious Disease, 12, 421–427.

Study Purpose

To determine the cumulative incidence of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) two years after transplant.

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

Following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), patients received low-dose valacyclovir (VCV) for prophylaxis against VZV.  Up to day 35, patients received oral acyclovir (ACV) 1,000 mg/day, and then from days 36 to 365, they received oral VCV 500 mg/day three days a week.  Patients were monitored for VZV for two years after HSCT.

Sample Characteristics

  • Forty adult patients (57% male, 43% female) were included.
  • Median age was 43 years (range 18–61).    
  • Diagnosis for transplant: ten patients had acute myeloblastic leukemia, eight had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, four had chronic myelogeneous leukemia, five had myelodysplastic syndrome, nine had Hodgkin lymphoma, one had multiple myeloma, and three had severe aplastic anemia.
  • Patients were excluded if they had renal or liver dysfunction, antithymocyte globulin, T cell-depleted graft, cord blood, or a hematologic malignancy and were not in remission prior to HSCT.
  • Patients from ages 16 to 70 who were seropositive for VZV-IgG antibody prior to allogeneic HSCT.  Those enrolled were not necessarily as young or as old as the eligibility criteria.

Setting

  • Multi-site
  • Hospitals participating in the Japan Hematological Oncology Clinical Study Group

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

  • Patients were undergoing posttransplant care.
  • The study has clinical applicability for antimicrobial prophylaxis in a transplant setting.

Study Design

This was a prospective, nonrandomized study.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

  • Development of VZV    
  • Dermal development of VZV (defined as generalized cutaneous distribution or characteristic vesicular skin lesions on an erythematous base within a dermatome)
  • Visceral development of VZV
  • Toxicities of VCV
  • Postherpetic neuralgia
     

Results

Breakthrough VZV occurred in two patients while receiving VCV.  After stopping VCV prophylaxis, an additional five patients developed VZV disease.  These seven patients had a favorable response to oral or intravenous VCV given at therapeutic doses.  Univariate analysis revealed no factors that significantly associated patients with incidence of VZV.

Conclusions

For patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, one year of low-dose VCV is safe and effective for preventing VZV.

Limitations

Small sample size

Nursing Implications

Patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT may benefit from the safe use of low-dose prophylactic VCV (500 mg/day three times a week) for VZV in the posttransplant setting.

Print

Osborn, R.L., Demoncada, A.C., & Feuerstein, M. (2006). Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: Meta-analyses. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 36, 13–34.

Purpose

To investigate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and patient education on depression, anxiety, pain, physical functioning, and quality of life (QOL) in adult cancer survivors

Search Strategy

The study involved searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Database for the period 1993–2004.

Literature Evaluated

The literature evaluated included 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five of which measured depression and all of which had been published 1993–2004. Authors assessed quality of the RCTs by means of the Jadad scale.

Sample Characteristics

The sample size was 1,492.

Conclusions

CBT is related to short-term effects on depression; individual interventions were more effective than group interventions. Neither CBT nor patient education produced significant long-term effects on depression.

Print

Osborn, R.L., Demoncada, A.C., & Feuerstein, M. (2006). Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: Meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 36, 13–34.

Purpose

To investigate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and patient education (PE) on anxiety in adult cancer survivors

Search Strategy

Databases searched were MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Database (1993–2004).

Search keywords were cancer, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), fatigue, stress, pain, physical function, social, self-management, evidence-based, interventions, and random/randomized.

Studies were included in the review if they

  • Reported on adult patients with cancer (all types and stages)
  • Had a control group, randomization, and measurable outcomes of interest (anxiety, depression, fatigue, QOL, physical function, and pain)
  • Had at least one follow-up assessment beyond post-treatment, which allowed for examination of duration of effects.

Studies were excluded if they were not randomized or controlled, had a score of less than four on checklist, did not report follow-up data, or did not report data on targeted outcomes.

Dissertations were excluded.

Literature Evaluated

  • A total of 592 studies were evaluated, with only 19 studies meeting criteria. Comprehensive meta-analysis was used to determine effect size for each outcome.
  • Quality was assessed by a modified version of Jadad’s six-item checklist (randomization, double blinding, descriptions of withdrawals and dropouts, statistical analyses, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and adverse effects).
  • Longitudinal study: Times of measurement varied from one week to 14 months. Median follow-up was defined as short-term (less than eight months) and long-term (more than eight months).
  • Four studies reviewed used CBT for anxiety.
    • CBT sessions varied from four weekly one-hour sessions to 55 weekly two-hour sessions.
    • CBT included stress management and problem-solving approaches.
  • One study reviewed used PE for anxiety.
    • PE sessions varied from one 20-minute session to six weekly one-hour sessions.
    • PE included information about illness, symptom management, and discussion of treatment options using booklets, videos, and other educational materials.

Sample Characteristics

  • The review reported on 1,492 adult cancer survivors.
  • All types and stages of cancer were represented.
  • Survivor age range was 18–84 years.
  • 790 survivors were assigned to interventions, and 702 were assigned to control (medical management only).

Results

  • CBT interventions on anxiety (four studies):
    • Large effect was noted for individual and group CBT (g = 1.99, p < 0.01; 95% CI 0.693.31).
    • Of these four studies, a sensitivity analysis revealed a large effect size for individual treatment (g = 2.41, p < 0.01; 95% CI 1.23.55) and no effect for group interventions (d = 0.03, p+0.82; 95% CI -0.200.25).
    • Forest plots representing the effect sizes of CBT on anxiety favor the intervention.
  • The single trial using PE to decrease anxiety resulted in no short-term effect on anxiety and did not include long-term follow-up on anxiety (d= -0.02, p = 0.89; 95% CI -0.360.31).

Limitations

  • Analysis did not consider patient adherence to pharmacologic interventions, which is known to be modest in medical patients.
  • No cost-benefit implications were noted.

Nursing Implications

CBT is effective for short-term management (less than 8 months) of anxiety. Individually based interventions were more effective than those delivered in a group format. Various CBT approaches provided in an individual format can assist cancer survivors in reducing the emotional distress of anxiety.

Print
Subscribe to