Paice, J.A., Portenoy, R., Lacchetti, C., Campbell, T., Cheville, A., Citron, M., . . . Koyyalagunta, L. (2016). Management of chronic pain in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO685206. Advance online publication.
RESOURCE TYPE: Evidence-based guideline
Thirty-five systematic reviews, 9 randomized controlled trials, and 19 other studies were used as the evidence base for the guidelines developed.
Does not add substantially to the body of evidence or recommendations for chronic cancer-related pain management. Does suggest that effectiveness of long-term pain management should consider aspects such as functional impact and not just reduction in pain severity or other pain-specific outcomes. Provides new information regarding suggested approaches to address potential problems of analgesic abuse and misuse.
Pagliaro, G., Pandolfi, P., Collina, N., Frezza, G., Brandes, A., Galli, M., . . . Marconi, L. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of Tong Len meditation practice in cancer patients: Evaluation of a distant psychological healing effect. Explore, 12, 42-49.
To determine the effectiveness of Tong Len meditation on depression, stress, anxiety, and self-perception of quality of life in a population of patients with cancer.
Tong Len meditation (Tibetan meditation practice), a distant healing compassionate act, was used for three months, three times a week for 15-20 minutes on a group of patients with cancer. The evaluation of the results with the POMS and EQ 5 D questionnaires took place after two months, three months, and one month after treatment cessation.
Considering the results of Tong Len meditation on depression, there was a significant improvement (p = 0.003) in the treatment group. As far as the other components, there were no significant differences between treatment and control groups. There was a significant increase in levels of vigor and activity in the control group (p = 0.009). In both groups, there was an increase in self-perceived quality of life, possibly due to a “white lab coat\" effect.
Tong Len meditation does not show statistically significant evidence to support scientific efficacy on depression, anxiety, or stress. It does show an improvement in both groups in self-perceived quality of life and an overall psychological gain, which might reflect a positive \"white lab coat\" effect.
Although Tong Len meditation might be beneficial to patients with cancer, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution due to limitations, including small sample size, non-homogeneity of tumor pathology, and cancer treatment.
Pages, J., Hazera, P., Mégarbane, B., du Cheyron, D., Thuong, M., Dutheil, J.J., . . . Daubin, C. (2016). Comparison of alcoholic chlorhexidine and povidone–iodine cutaneous antiseptics for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infection: A cohort and quasi-experimental multicenter study. Intensive Care Medicine, 42, 1418–1426.
To compare the effectiveness of different skin antiseptics in the prevention of catheter-related infection (CRI)
The type of antiseptic used for skin disinfection for catheter care was chosen by the intensive care units of participating hospitals. Maximal sterile precautions for catheter insertion according to guidelines were used. All catheters were nontunneled, and none were used for routine blood sampling. Decisions to remove catheters were at the physicians' discretion and, after removal, catheter tip and peripheral blood cultures were conducted. A one-step procedure of skin cleansing was conducted with 2% chlorhexidine, and a four-step protocol of scrub, rinse, dry, and disinfect was used with other antiseptics. A propensity score was calculated from analysis of covariance to determine the propensity for CRI and was controlled in analysis techniques. In four ICUs, staff switched from a povidone iodine antisepsis to chlorhexidine, and separate analysis of differences in outcomes were analyzed individually (1,368 patients). All suspected cases of CRI were reviewed and determined by a blinded committee.
CRI defined as catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) or the combination of a catheter tip colonization and clinical signs of sepsis with no other cause identified.
The use of chlorhexidine was associated with a decreased risk of CRI (2 per 1,000 catheter days, p = 0.037). The unadjusted incidence of CRI was higher in the povidone iodine group compared to the chlorhexidine group (2.8 versus 2 per 1,000 catheter days, p = 0.001). Overall, CRI risk in the units that switched from povidone iodine to chlorhexidine was lower with chlorhexidine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.31, p = 0.005). However, no significant differences in CRBSI existed between groups.
The use of a skin antisepsis with a 2% chlorhexidine alcohol preparation for catheter care may be associated with a lower incidence of CRI.
The use of chlorhexidine skin antisepsis may be associated with a lower incidence of CRI. The evidence has several limitations; however, it is consistent with the body of evidence showing the efficacy of chlorhexidine skin preparation as part of central venous catheter care.
Page, B.R., Shaw, E.G., Lu, L., Bryant, D., Grisell, D., Lesser, G.J., . . . Shah, S. (2015). Phase II double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study of armodafinil for brain radiation-induced fatigue. Neuro-Oncology, 17, 1393–1401.
Patients were randomized to receive a placebo or 150 mg per day dose of armodafinil. Armodafinil was taken daily during seven weeks of radiation therapy and then an additional four weeks. There were no dose modifications or drug holidays. If patients could not tolerate the study agent, it was discontinued. Fatigue, cognitive function, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, at the end of RT, and four weeks after RT. Toxicities were evaluated weekly.
PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment
Double blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, controlled trial (n = 26 [armodafinil], n = 28 [control])
Nine patients dropped out of the study by the end of RT. The most common adverse effects were headache, insomnia, nausea, anxiety, arthralgia, dizziness, dry mouth, sinusitis, and throat and respiratory infections. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the study groups. There were no significant differences between groups in fatigue. In both groups, fatigue increased during treatment and improved following the completion of RT. Neurocognitive measures improved slightly over time in both groups with no significant difference between the groups. Among patients with the most fatigue at baseline, those taking armodafinil showed improvements in fatigue at the end of RT. Armodafinil also did not improve neurocognitive outcomes at the end of RT or at four weeks post RT in the subsets of participants with high or low levels of fatigue at baseline.
Armodafinil was not shown to improve fatigue or cognitive function measures in patients receiving brain irradiation. Armodafinil appeared to show some benefit in improving fatigue among those with high levels of fatigue at baseline.
The findings did not provide overall support for effectiveness of armodafinil to reduce fatigue in this study although patients with the highest level of fatigue at baseline appeared to have some benefit. Additional research is warranted to determine if there is any benefit of psychostimulants for fatigue and cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors undergoing radiation therapy.
Pachman, D.R., Weisbrod, B.L., Seisler, D.K., Barton, D.L., Fee-Schroeder, K.C., Smith, T.J., . . . Loprinzi, C.L. (2015). Pilot evaluation of Scrambler therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23, 943–951.
To determine the effectiveness of Scrambler therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Scrambler therapy involves the use of low-dose electrical stimulation delivered through electrodes placed around patient-reported painful areas. Five sets of electrodes can be placed around a painful area at one time. The goal of this study was to replace pain with no pain and/or lessening of symptoms. Patients were treated daily for up to 10 days.
PHASE OF CARE: Mutliple phases of care
Prospective, open-label trial
Measurements included numerical analog scales from 0–10 that were part of a neuropathy questionnaire, a global impression of change questionnaire, and the Rydel-Seiffer Tuning Fork to evaluate patient vibratory sense.
Pain scores decreased 53% from baseline to day 10. Numbness decreased 37%, and tingling decreased 44%. Increased quality of life was reported during treatment as well as during the 10-week follow-up period. All of these changes were significant (p < 0.0002). The vibration perception scores measured with the Rydel-Seiffer Tuning Fork also improved.
Although Scrambler therapy demonstrated positive effects in this trial, a large randomized, controlled trial is needed to confirm its efficacy in CIPN. Special training and experienced personnel need to be in place for someone to deliver this therapy. Practicality and cost need to be factored in for this type of intervention.
A large, randomized study is needed for future research. Scrambler therapy is not a very practical treatment, and cost of the treatment was not discussed. Also, specific training is needed to administer it. Currently, insufficient evidence recommends its use.
Pacetti, U., Veltri, E., Fattoruso, S.I., Cardillo, F.D., Evangelista, S., Cognetti, F., & Fabi, A. (2013). Single-dose palonosetron and dose-reduced regimen of dexamethasone in preventing nausea and vomiting by anthracycline-including chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. Anticancer Research, 33(4), 1721–1724.
To evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose dexamethasone (4 mg) given with palonosetron on acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC)
Day 1 (30 minutes before chemotherapy): Administration of palonosetron 0.25 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg intravenously
Days 2 and 3: Dexamethasone 4 mg intramuscularly daily
Patients were given a diary to record their emesis episodes, nausea and its severity, and use of rescue medication within the first 24 hours and on days 2–5 after chemotherapy. Patients participated in minimum of one chemotherapy course up to a maximum of four chemotherapy courses.
Course 1: 72% of patients had completed response (no emesis, no rescue medication) in the acute phase and complete control (no emesis, no rescue medication, no more than mild nausea) in the delayed phase; 12% had partial response (one emesis, no more than two days of rescue medication) in the acute phase and complete control in the delayed phase; 12% had partial response in the acute phase and partial control (severe nausea no more than two days and needing rescue medication) in the delayed phase; and one patient (4%) did not respond to prophylaxis. Among all chemotherapy courses combined: 72% of the courses showed complete response in the acute phase and complete control in the delayed phase; 8% had partial response in the acute phase and complete control in the delayed phase; 4% had partial response in the acute phase and partial control in the delayed phase; 15% had complete response in the acute phase and partial control in the delayed phase; no control of emesis occurred in one of the courses (1%). No adverse side effects (e.g., constipation, abdominal pain, insomnia, elevated blood glucose levels) were reported.
Low-dose dexamethasone given in conjunction with one dose of palonosetron appears to be effective for the treatment of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer receiving HEC. However, additional research is needed to allow for further comparison of response to variable dexamethasone dosing in conjunction with 5-HT3 for prophylaxis of HEC.
Low-dose dexamethasone is an effective treatment for acute and delayed nausea and vomiting with no significant side effects. However, additional research studies are needed to allow for further comparison of response to variable dexamethasone dosing in conjunction with 5-HT3 for prophylaxis of HEC. The authors suggest that patients may experience similar efficacy with an antiemetic regimen that includes lower doses of steroids. Reducing the total dose of steroids has the potential to simultaneously reduce the untoward effects that are known to result from administration of steroids (e.g., altered glucose levels, bone loss, sleep disturbances, mood changes).
Pace, A., Giannarelli, D., Galie, E., Savarese, A., Carpano, S., Della Giulia, M., . . . Cognetti, F. (2010). Vitamin E neuroprotection for cisplatin neuropathy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology, 74, 762–766.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of vitamin E in patients treated with cisplatin.
Patients were randomized to either vitamin E 400 mg per day (α-tocopherol) or placebo. The vitamin E (or placebo) was started orally before chemotherapy and continued for three months after completion of cisplatin.
The study was conducted at multiple outpatient sites: the National Cancer Institute in Rome and the National Neurologic Institute in Milan, Italy.
The study had a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial design.
Neurotoxicity score was significantly lower in patients receiving vitamin E than in the placebo group (mean score of 1.4 versus 4.1; unpaired t test, p < 0.01). Neurotoxicity incidence differed significantly between groups (group 1, 1 of 17 participants; group 2, 10 of 24 participants; p < 0.01). Also, the relative risk of developing signs or symptoms of neurotoxicity was significantly lower in group 1 than group 2 (relative risk of 0.14, 95% confidence interval [0.02, 1], p < 0.05). At follow-up, compared with baseline, mean sural and sensory median nerve amplitude values were significantly decreased in the control group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.008, respectively), while median nerve amplitude was unchanged and sural nerve amplitude was decreased, but not significantly, in patients receiving Vitamin E.
Vitamin E may be helpful in reducing neurotoxic effects of cisplatin, but larger randomized trials are needed.
Cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy can be painful and also interfere with a patient’s quality of life; however, future research is needed with larger trials before Vitamin E is recommended. Also, drug interactions need to be considered.
Pace, A., Savarese, A., Picardo, M., Maresca, V., Pacetti, U., Del Monte, G., . . . Bove, L. (2003). Neuroprotective effect of vitamin E supplementation in patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 927–931.
This study evaluated the neuroprotective effect of vitamin E in patients with solid tumor malignancy treated with cisplatin chemotherapy.
Patients were randomly assigned to either group 1, which received vitamin E supplementation during cisplatin chemotherapy, or to group 2, which received cisplatin chemotherapy alone. Vitamin E 300 mg per day was administered orally before cisplatin chemotherapy and continued for three months after the suspension of treatment.
Twenty patients dropped out of the study. Plasma levels of vitamin E were in the normal range and not significantly different between the two groups (8.06 and 7.17 mg/ml, respectively). Twelve of the 14 patients in the control group developed CIPN as compared to 4 of 13 patients who received vitamin E supplementation.
Vitamin E supplementation significantly protects against cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy and reduces incidence and intensity of neurologic signs and symptoms.
Ozturk, C.N., Ozturk, C., Glasgow, M., Platek, M., Ashary, Z., Kuhn, J., . . . Gurunluoglu, R. (2016). Free vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic evidence based review. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 69, 1234–1247.
STUDY PURPOSE: To review current research of free vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) for the treatment of lymphedema
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review
PHASE OF CARE: Pre- and postoperative VLNT
APPLICATIONS: Elder care
The findings suggest that the use of VLNT may be helpful in reducing lymphedema. Larger studies with standardized measurements are needed to create a stronger body of research to fully evaluate this surgical procedure.
Limited evidence supports surgical interventions to manage lymphedema. However, the studies being conducted, although scant, do have potential, but outcomes vary presently.
Oza, A., Hallemeier, C., Goodnough, L., Khoury, H., Shenoy, S., Devine, S., . . . Adkins, D. (2006). Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized prophylactic granulocyte transfusions given after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation result in a modest reduction of febrile days and intravenous antibiotic usage. Transfusion, 46, 14–23.
To compare the clinical outcomes between allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) recipients who did and did not receive matched granulocyte transfusions.
Patients who did not have an ABO matched donor were assigned to a comparison control group, and those with a matched donor were assigned to receive granulocyte transfusions. Patients received conditioning either with total body irradiation, etoposide and cyclophosphamide or busulfan and cyclophosphamide given over seven days, or the regimen of total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide administered over three days. Posttransplant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given to all patients on day 1 until neutrophil recovery. No prophylactic antibacterial or antifungal antibiotics were given. Prophylactic acyclovir was given to prevent herpes simplex infection. Empiric antibiotic therapy was given for an initial fever of 38.3°C or higher. Empiric therapy of amphotericin B was given for persistent fever.
Patients were undergoing the active antitumor treatment phase of care.
This was a prospective two-group study.
Patients receiving granulocyte transfusion had a mean of 13.2 days of hospitalization, compared to 29.6 days in the control group (p = 0.03). Patients receiving transfusions had fewer days of severe neutropenia. This difference was 1.5 days on average (p = 0.0005). The percentage of patients who developed fever during hospital stay from the start of conditioning to discharge was 82.7% in patients who did not receive granulocytes versus 64.2% in those who received granulocyte transfusions (p = 0.03). There were no other differences between groups in bacteremia or overall survival.
Granulocyte transfusions in this group of patients may have a statistically significant but clinically mild beneficial effect on the duration of neutropenia and hospital stay.
* There was no subgroup analysis between those who may have received empiric treatment for fever as described in the study methods; therefore, it is unclear if such treatment influenced the results. Sample sizes with results reporting tend to vary throughout the report, so it is unclear if this is related to missing data from the retrospective method.
The findings suggested that granulocyte transfusions may have some benefits for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients; however, this study did not provide strong support for this intervention due to study limitations. Because these patients did not receive routine prophylactic antibiotic or antifungal treatment, it is not clear what the clinical role of granulocyte transfusion might be in the setting of more aggressive preventive clinical management.