References
Blandy, C., Chabal, F., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., & Julian-Reynier, C. (2003). Testing participation in BRCA1/2-positive families: Initiator role of index cases. Genetic Testing, 7, 225-233. dx.doi.org/10.1089/109065703322537241
Claes, E., Evers-Kiebooms, G., Boogaerts, A., Decruyenaere, M., Denayer, L., & Legius, E. (2003). Communication with close and distant relatives in the context of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 116A, 11-19. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.10868
Coward, D. D. (2003). Facilitation of self-transcendence in a breast cancer support group: II. Oncology Nursing Forum, 30, 291-300. dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.ONF.291-300
Crotser, C. B., & Boehmke, M. (2009). Survivorship considerations in adults with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome: State of the science. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 3, 21-42. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0077-7
d'Agincourt-Canning, L. (2006). Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Responsibility and choice. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 97-118. dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305284002
Daly, M. B., Barsevick, A., Miller, S. M., Buckman, R., Costalas, J., Montgomery, S., & Bingler, R. (2001). Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy. Family and Community Health, 24(3), 13-26.
Diekelmann, N., Allen, D., & Tanner, C. (1989). The NLN criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: A critical hermeneutic analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
Di Prospero, L. S., Seminsky, M., Honeyford, J., Doan, B., Franssen, E., Meschino, W., … Warner, E. (2001). Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: Findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey.
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 164, 1005-1009. Retrieved from
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/164/7/1005 http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/164/7/1005
Draucker, C. B. (1999). The critique of Heideggerian hermeneutical nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 360-373. dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01091.x
Finlay, E., Stopfer, J. E., Burlingame, E., Evans, K. G., Nathanson, K. L., Weber, B. L., … Domchek, S. M. (2008). Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing, 12, 81-91. dx.doi.org/10.1089/gte.2007.0037
Forrest, K., Simpson, S. A., Wilson, B. J., van Teijlingen, E. R., McKee, L., Haites, N., & Matthews, E. (2003). To tell or not to tell: Barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk. Clinical Genetics, 64, 317-326. dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00142.x
Foster, C., Eeles, R., Ardern-Jones, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2004). Juggling roles and expectations: Dilemmas faced by women talking to relatives about cancer and genetic testing. Psychology and Health, 19, 439-455. dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870440410001684168
Green, J., Richards, M., Murton, F., Statham, H., & Hallowell, N. (1997). Family communication and genetic counseling: The case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 45-60. dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025611818643
Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., & Watson, M. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: Patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67, 492-502. dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00443.x
Hamilton, R. J., & Bowers, B. J. (2007). The theory of genetic vulnerability: A Roy model exemplar. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20, 254-265. dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894318407303127
Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and time [J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.]. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays [W. Lovitt, Trans.]. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135-148. dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.15.2.135
Hughes, C., Lerman, C., Schwartz, M., Peshkin, B. N., Wenzel, L., Narod, S., … Main, D. (2002). All in the family: Evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 107, 143-150. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10110
Johnson, M. E. (2000). Heidegger and meaning: Implications for phenomenological research. Nursing Philosophy, 1(2), 134-146. dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-769x.2000.00027.x
Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2004). We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC). Psycho-Oncology, 13, 335-345. dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.745
Kenen, R., Ardern-Jones, A., & Eeles, R. (2006). "Social separation" among women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 149-162. dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-9015-2
Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kuhn, N., Hoskins, L., Letocha, A., Kenen, R., … Greene, M. H. (2008). Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: Communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being. Psycho-Oncology, 17, 812-821. dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1373
Leonard, V. W. (1989). A Heideggerian phenomenologic perspective on the concept of the person. Advances in Nursing Science, 11(4), 40-55.
Liede, A., Metcalfe, K., Hanna, D., Hoodfar, E., Snyder, C., Durham, C., … Narod, S. A. (2000). Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 1494-1504. dx.doi.org/10.1086/316907
McGivern, B., Everett, J., Yager, G. G., Baumiller, R. C., Hafertepen, A., & Saal, H. M. (2004). Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Genetics in Medicine, 6, 503-509.
McInerney-Leo, A., Biesecker, B. B., Hadley, D. W., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Johnson, E., … Struewing, J. P. (2005). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: Impact on relationships. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 133, 165-169. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.30566
Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Giusti, R., Loud, J., Weissman, N., & Greene, M. H. (2004). Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 130A, 258-264. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.30271
Schwartz, M. D., Peshkin, B. N., Tercyak, K. P., Taylor, K. L., & Valdimarsdottir, H. (2005). Decision making and decision support for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Health Psychology, 24(4, Suppl.), S78 S84. dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S78
Segal, J., Esplen, M. J., Toner, B., Baedorf, S., Narod, S., & Butler, K. (2004). An investigation of the disclosure process and support needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 125A, 267-272. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.20485
Smith, K. L., & Issacs, C. (2006-2007). Management of women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Breast Disease, 27, 51-67.
Wagner Costalas, J., Itzen, M., Malick, J., Babb, J. S., Bove, B., Godwin, A. K., & Daly, M. B. (2003). Communication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 results to at-risk relatives: A cancer risk assessment program's experience. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 119C(1), 11-18. dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.10003