Prevost, V., Delorme, C., Grach, M.C., Chvetzoff, G., & Hureau, M. (2016). Therapeutic education in improving cancer pain management: A synthesis of available studies. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 33, 599–612.

DOI Link

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: Literature review with goals to synthesize current studies and update findings in order to obtain a current, comprehensive estimate of the benefits of pain education.

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: PubMed

YEARS INCLUDED: 1987 to March 2014

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Keywords: cancer AND pain AND patient AND education. MeSH terms: pain, pain management, patient education as topic, self-care methods, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, and neoplasms. 

EXCLUSION CRITERIA: No specific exclusion criteria.

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 37

EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Criteria used to evaluate: Pain experience, patient satisfaction, and patients’ communication skills and decision making.

Sample Characteristics

FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED: 44

TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW: 6,308

SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 30-970

KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Patients with cancer

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Multiple phases of care

Results

Pain experience: 85% of the studies reported that PEP (Pain Education Programs) significantly improved knowledge and beliefs, 52% of studies showed a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity when using PEP, but none of the studies (except one) showed that the intervention had any clear benefits on QOL.

Patient satisfaction: 90% of patients believed that PEP was helpful and 78% said that PEP made them more involved in pain management. 

Patients’ communication skills and decision making: Communication with clinicians was the most frequently developed behavior, and those patients who scored higher in active communication reported better pain relief and fewer barriers to pain management.

Conclusions

Research indicates a growing interest in therapeutic education of patients with cancer pain. PEP objectives have shifted from a focus on improving patients’ knowledge about pain management to enhancing their communication skills and attitudes. Additional research is warranted to better evaluate PEP effectiveness.

Limitations

  • Limited search
  • No quality evaluation
  • High heterogeneity
  • Only English or French

Nursing Implications

PEP has been proven to increase patient knowledge of pain management, so it would be wise to increase training for nurses to conduct these interventions properly.