Topkan, E., & Karaoglu, A. (2006). Octreotide in the management of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea refractory to loperamide in patients with rectal carcinoma. Oncology, 71(5–6), 354–360.

DOI Link

Intervention Characteristics/Basic Study Process

  • Patients received 150 mcg octreotide subcutaneously three times daily once they were unresponsive to oral loperamide administration (4 mg three times per day for 48 hours).
  • All patients received hydration and were advised to consume a low-fiber, low-lactose diet.

Sample Characteristics

  • The study reported on 42 patients with rectal carcinoma who experienced grade 2-3 diarrhea associated with at least one course of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration refractory to loperamide during whole pelvic radiation therapy (RT).
  • The maximum number of days of octreotide treatment was five. If patients had progressive improvement of chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhea (CRTID) during the five days of treatment but not a complete response (CR), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was discontinued and octreotide was extended for three days.

Study Design

This study was prospectively designed.

Measurement Instruments/Methods

The primary goal was complete resolution of CRTID. The secondary goal was prevention of treatment delays attributed to diarrhea.

Results

  • The median duration of diarrhea prior to first dose of octreotide was 78 hours.
  • Most cases of diarrhea were diagnosed in the first four weeks.
  • The median time-to-first dose of octreotide acetate was 19 days.
  • All patients tolerated octreotide well.
  • Complete resolution of diarrhea was achieved in 34 of 42 patients during the planned treatment period (five days).
  • Average time to CR was 2.7 days.
  • No treatment delays were reported in 34 patients who responded to subcutaneous octreotide administration.
  • CRT was delayed an average of 7.7 days in the eight unresponsive patients.
  • Those with CR were able to be treated as outpatients; nonresponders required hospitalization.

Limitations

  • The sample size was small.
  • The study looked at rectal carcinoma only so generalizing to other disease sites is difficult.
  • No statistical significance was reported.
  • Only descriptive results were provided.