Suadoni, M.T. (2014). Are probiotics more efficacious than placebo at preventing radiotherapy-induced diarrhoea in adults with cancer. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, 13, 226–235. 

DOI Link

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To examine how effective probiotics are in preventing radiation-induced diarrhea versus placebo
 
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: MEDLINE, EMBASE

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomized, controlled trial; adults aged 18 and older, concurrent chemotherapy; presence of diarrhea included as outcome or enough data provided to calculate
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Absence of placebo group; use of probiotics for treatment other than prevention of diarrhea; not in English

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 63 retrieved
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Only randomized, controlled trials were pulled for this study.

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 4
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 917
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Chitapanarux et al. study—63 female patients receiving RT and cisplatin chemotherapy for cervical cancer; Delia et al. study—490 patients receiving RT for colon, rectal, or cervical cancer; Germain et al. study—246 patients receiving RT for rectal, cervical, endometrial or prostate cancer; Giralt et al. study—118 patients receiving RT and cisplatin chemotherapy for cervical or endometrial cancer

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Results

The Chitapanarux and Delia studies were most robust and the Giralt study was least robust. The Germain study could not be determined. There were no adverse events reported in the studies. The Chitapanarux and Delia studies determined that probiotics were beneficial and produced statistically significant results in the study population. The Germain study reported benefits that were statistically significant at standard dose and at high dose, which was not statistically significant. Studies revealed high clinical significance.

Conclusions

Evidence supporting contention that probiotics are beneficial is low quality.

Limitations

  • Scope
  • Objectivity
  • No second reviewer

Nursing Implications

More research is needed on the use of probiotics with rigorous randomized placebo controlled studies.

Legacy ID

5809