de Melo Manzi, N., de Campos Pereira Silveira, R.C., & dos Reis, P.E. (2015). Prophylaxis for mucositis induced by ambulatory chemotherapy: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72, 735–746.

DOI Link

Purpose

STUDY PURPOSE: To systematically review evidence regarding interventions used to prevent chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM)

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

Search Strategy

DATABASES USED: CINAHL, Cochrane collaboration, PubMed, LILACS
 
KEYWORDS: mucositis; stomatitis; nelplasms; antinelplastic agents; drug therapy; prevent and control and chemotherapy
 
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Controlled trials
 
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies regarding the treatment of OM, OM associated with radiation therapy, studies of patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and non-English speaking patients

Literature Evaluated

TOTAL REFERENCES RETRIEVED: 931
 
EVALUATION METHOD AND COMMENTS ON LITERATURE USED: Jadad scale and Cochrane risk of bias tools used to evaluate study quality

Sample Characteristics

  • FINAL NUMBER STUDIES INCLUDED = 20
  • TOTAL PATIENTS INCLUDED IN REVIEW = 1,626
  • SAMPLE RANGE ACROSS STUDIES: 16–326 patients
  • KEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Various patient types

Phase of Care and Clinical Applications

PHASE OF CARE: Active antitumor treatment

Results

  • Cryotherapy was evaluated in four studies. Cryotherapy reduced the seriousness and incidence of OM. Three of these were among patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).   
  • Limited research evidence for oral care in general and lack of consistent definition and components of oral care
  • Two palifermin studies were included, showing its effectiveness for the prevention of OM; however, they were of small sample sizes.
  • Two studies looked at allopurinol and had mixed results.
  • Two studies examined the use of chlorhexidine and had mixed results.

Conclusions

Based on this review, the strongest evidence was in favor of cryotherapy in patients receiving 5-FU. The evidence was insufficient in other interventions to demonstrate a benefit.

Limitations

Very few studies were included, and why this search did not yield a larger number of studies for some of these interventions was unclear. Exclusion criteria may have eliminated many. Most included studies had small sample sizes.

Nursing Implications

The findings support the use of cryotherapy for the prevention of OM in patients receiving 5-FU. Although not studied extensively, this intervention should have benefit in patients receiving any agent with a short half-life. The amount of ice chips, etc. used and the duration of the cryotherapy varied. Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines recommend a 30-minute duration and an amount of ice that can easily be moved around in the mouth.

Legacy ID

5982